OMB APPROVAL -------------------------- OMB Number: 3235-0059 Expires: August 31, 2004 Estimated average burden hours per response...14.73 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant [x] Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ] Check the appropriate box: [ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement. [ ] CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2)). [X] Definitive Proxy Statement. [ ] Definitive Additional Materials. [ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 LECTEC CORPORATION - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box): [X] No fee required. [ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. 1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5) Total fee paid: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. [ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. 1) Amount Previously Paid: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) Filing Party: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4) Date Filed: - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERSONS WHO POTENTIALLY ARE TO RESPOND TO THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RESPOND UNLESS THE FORM DISPLAYS A CURRENTLY VALID OMB CONTROL NUMBER. SEC 1913 (02-02) LECTEC CORPORATION 10701 RED CIRCLE DRIVE MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 ------------------ NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ------------------ The Annual Meeting of the shareholders of LecTec Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), will be held at The Hilton Garden Inn Eden Prairie Hotel, 6330 Point Chase, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, on Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 3:00 p.m. (CDT), for the following purposes: 1. To elect five directors to serve on the Board of Directors for a term of one year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. 2. To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's independent auditor for the Company's current fiscal year. 3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Only shareholders of record as of the close of business on Monday, March 24, 2003, the record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting in person, please complete, sign and promptly return the enclosed form of proxy. If you later desire to revoke your proxy, you may do so at any time before it is exercised. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS /s/John D. LeGray John D. LeGray Secretary Minnetonka, Minnesota April 25, 2003 LECTEC CORPORATION 10701 RED CIRCLE DRIVE MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 PROXY STATEMENT ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS -- MAY 22, 2003 INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of LecTec Corporation (the "Company") for use at the Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held on Thursday, May 22, 2003, at 3:00 p.m. (CDT), at The Hilton Garden Inn Eden Prairie Hotel, 6330 Point Chase, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, or any adjournments thereof (the "Meeting"), for the purposes set forth herein and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Proxies will be voted in accordance with the directions specified therein. These proxy solicitation materials and the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 are first being sent to shareholders on or about April 24, 2003. If you return a signed and dated proxy card but do not indicate how the shares are to be voted, those shares will be voted FOR each of the items of business described in this proxy statement. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Meeting will be tabulated by the election inspectors appointed for the Meeting. Shares voted as abstentions on any matter (or a "withhold vote for" as to directors) will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Meeting and treated as unvoted, although present and entitled to vote, for purposes of determining the approval of each matter as to which a shareholder has abstained. As a result, abstentions have the same effect as voting against a proposal. If a broker submits a proxy that indicates the broker does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on one or more matters, those shares will be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting, but will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to such matters. As a result, a "broker non-vote" with respect to the election of directors or ratification of appointment of auditors will not have the effect of a vote "for" or a vote "against" those proposals. Under Minnesota law, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock present or represented and entitled to vote at the Meeting is necessary to approve each item of business properly presented at the meeting of shareholders. However, if the shares present and entitled to vote on that item of business at the time that the item is presented for a vote would not constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting, then the item must be approved by a majority of the voting power of the minimum number of shares that would constitute such a quorum. As of March 24, 2003, the record date fixed for the determination of shareholders of the Company entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting, there were 3,966,395 outstanding shares of common stock, which is the only class of capital stock of the Company. Each shareholder will be entitled to one vote per share on all matters acted upon at the Meeting. There is no cumulative voting. 1 Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be tabulated by the election inspectors appointed for the Meeting. Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the shareholder giving it at any time prior to its use by (i) delivering to the principal office of the Company a written notice of revocation, (ii) filing with the Company a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or (iii) attending the Meeting and voting in person. The costs of this solicitation will be borne by the Company. Proxies may be solicited by the Company's directors, officers and regular employees, without extra compensation, by mail, telegram, telephone and personal solicitation. The Company will request brokerage houses and other nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward soliciting material to beneficial owners of the Company's common stock. The Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners for their expenses in forwarding solicitation materials to beneficial owners. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS The Company's Amended and Restated By-laws provide that the size of the Board of Directors shall be one or more directors, with the number of directors to be determined by the shareholders from time to time prior to the election of directors. The Board of Directors may increase the number of directors at any time. Five persons have been nominated for election as directors at the Meeting. Directors are elected to serve a one-year term and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Lee M. Berlin, Alan C. Hymes, M.D., Marilyn K. Speedie, Ph.D., Donald C. Wegmiller and Rodney A. Young are the current directors who have been nominated for reelection to the Board to serve for a term of one year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Bert J. McKasy retired from the Board of Directors in December 2002. All of the nominees are currently members of the Board of Directors of the Company and have served in that capacity since originally elected or designated as indicated below in the information concerning nominees. A shareholder submitting a proxy may vote for all or any of the nominees for election to the Board of Directors or may withhold his or her vote from all or any of such nominees. If a submitted proxy is properly signed but unmarked with respect to the election of directors, the proxy agents named in the proxy will vote the shares represented thereby for the election of all of the nominees. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve the Company as a director if elected; however, should any nominee become unwilling or unable to serve if elected, the proxy agents named in the proxy will exercise their voting power in favor of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE FIVE NOMINATED DIRECTORS. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF THE FIVE NOMINEES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 2 INFORMATION CONCERNING NOMINEES Lee M. Berlin, 81 years old, has been a Director since 1981 and served as Chairman of the Board from 1983 through May 1993. He served as the Company's Chief Executive Officer from 1983 to 1989. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Berlin served in a variety of foreign and domestic marketing, product development and general management positions with Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company ("3M"). Alan C. Hymes, M.D., 71 years old, is a founder of the Company and has been a Director since 1977. In addition, Mr. Hymes acts as the Company's medical consultant. Mr. Hymes was engaged in the private practice of surgery since 1968 but has recently retired. He is a diplomat of the American Board of Surgery and the American Board of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Marilyn K. Speedie, Ph.D., 55 years old, has been a Director since 1997 and is the Dean of the College of Pharmacy and a professor at the University of Minnesota. Prior to her association with the University of Minnesota in 1996, Dr. Speedie held several professorship and departmental chairperson positions at the University of Maryland from 1989 to 1995, the most recent being in the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Dr. Speedie has been the recipient of numerous honors, the most recent in of which was as an inductee as Fellow of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists in October of 1996. Dr. Speedie also co-authored a book published in 1996 entitled "Pharmacognosy and Pharmacobiotechnology". Donald C. Wegmiller, 64 years old, has served as a Director since 1997. Since April 1993, Mr. Wegmiller has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Clark/Bardes Consulting - Healthcare Group, a consulting firm specializing in compensation and benefits for health care executives and physicians. From May 1987 until April 1993, Mr. Wegmiller was President and CEO of Health One Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota. He currently serves as a Director of ALLETE (formerly known as Minnesota Power), Possis Medical, Inc. and JLJ Medical Devices International, LLC. From 1986 to 1988, Mr. Wegmiller served as Chairman of the Board of the American Hospital Association. From 1972 to 1976 and 1981 to 1988, Mr. Wegmiller served as a White House staff assistant to Presidents Nixon, Ford and Reagan. Rodney A. Young, 48 years old, has served as Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company since August 1996 and as Chairman of the Board since November 1996. Prior to assuming these positions with the Company, Mr. Young served Baxter International, Inc. for five years in various management roles, most recently as Vice President and General Manager of the Specialized Distribution Division. In addition to serving as Chairman and Director for LecTec Corporation, Mr. Young also serves as a Director of Possis Medical, Inc., Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota and Health Fitness Corporation. 3 MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS During fiscal year 2002, the Board of Directors held four meetings and sixteen conference calls. Each Director holding office during the fiscal year attended at least 75% of the total meetings of the Board of Directors (held during the period for which they were a director) and committees of the Board on which they served. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee, which are described below. The Company does not have a Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee comprised of Mr. Wegmiller, Mr. Berlin and Dr. Hymes. Mr. McKasy served as Chairman of the Audit Committee until his resignation in December of 2002. Mr. Wegmiller replaced Mr. McKasy as Chairman of the Audit Committee in 2003. All of the members of the Audit Committee are "independent" as defined in Rule 4200(a)(14) of the National Association of Securities Dealers' listing standards. The Audit Committee reviews and investigates all matters pertaining to the accounting activities of the Company and the relationship between the Company and its independent auditor. The Audit Committee held two meetings during fiscal year 2002. The Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee comprised of Mr. Wegmiller, who serves as the Committee's Chairman, Mr. Berlin and Dr. Hymes. The Compensation Committee determines and periodically evaluates the various levels and methods of compensation for directors, officers and employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee held one meeting during calendar year 2002. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Directors who are not employees of the Company are paid for their services at a rate of $6,000 per fiscal year plus $1,000 per regular board meeting plus reasonable meeting expenses. This compensation arrangement became effective during 2001. However, both types of payments were suspended beginning with the meeting held in December 2001 and have not been reinstated. 4 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Our Audit Committee reviews the Company's financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors adopted an Audit Committee charter in October 2000. In fulfilling its responsibilities, our Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 with the Company's management and independent auditors. Management is responsible for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Committee discussed with the independent auditors, the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditors required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, and has discussed with the independent auditors the independent auditors' independence. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. THE AUDIT COMMITTEE Don Wegmiller, Chairman Lee M. Berlin Alan C. Hymes, M.D. 5 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for establishing compensation policy and administering the compensation programs for the Company's executive officers. The Committee is composed entirely of independent outside directors. The Committee meets as necessary to review executive compensation policies, the design of compensation programs and individual salaries, and awards for the executive officers. The purpose of this report is to inform shareholders of the Company's compensation policies for executive officers and the rationale for the compensation paid to executive officers. COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY The Company's compensation program is designed to motivate and reward executive officers responsible for attaining the financial and strategic objectives essential to the Company's long-term success and growth in shareholder value. The compensation program has been designed to provide a competitive level of total compensation and offers incentive and equity ownership opportunities directly linked to the Company's performance and shareholder return. The Committee believes it is in the best interests of the shareholders to reward executive officers when the Company's performance objectives are achieved and to provide significantly less compensation when these objectives are not met. Therefore, a significant portion of executive compensation is comprised of "at risk" performance and stock-based incentives. Key objectives of the compensation program are to: o Provide a strong, direct link between the Company's financial and strategic goals and executive compensation; o Motivate executive officers to achieve corporate operating goals through an emphasis on performance-based compensation; o Align the interests of executive officers with those of the Company's shareholders by providing a significant portion of total compensation that is LecTec stock-based; and o Provide competitive total compensation in order to attract and retain high caliber key executive officers critical to the long-term success of the Company. EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PROGRAM The key components of the Company's executive officer compensation program are base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives. These elements are described below. During fiscal year 2002, specific and objective criteria were utilized to determine each element of an executive's compensation package. 6 BASE SALARY. The Committee annually reviews the base salaries of executive officers. In determining appropriate salary levels, the Committee considers the following criteria: o scope and complexity of the position including required substantive knowledge and required training; o level of responsibility including number of employees directly supervised; o past performance including revenue generated from operations under the management of the executive officer; and o salary levels for comparable positions at industry peer group companies and the market opportunities available to the executive officer. In January 2002, the current executive officers accepted a 10% salary decrease as a cost reduction measure. ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS. The purpose of the Company's annual incentive program is to provide a direct financial incentive in the form of an annual cash bonus to executive officers and key managers who achieve corporate operating goals established under the Company's annual operating plan. Executive officers are eligible for cash bonuses ranging from 30% to 60% of base salary. The size of the bonus pool is dependent upon the following criteria: o the measure of annual sales actually achieved compared to the level of annual sales contained in the Company's annual budget as approved by the Board of Directors; and o the measure of profits (or loss) actually achieved compared to the level of profits (or loss) contained in the Company's annual budget as approved by the Board of Directors. An executive officer's individual bonus is dependent upon the following criteria: o annual sales directly attributable to operations managed by the executive officer; o achievement of significant corporate goals which do not generate sales; and o the results of the executive officer's annual performance review. In addition to the above criteria, the Compensation Committee retains ultimate discretion to make final bonus determinations based on the best interests of the Company. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS. Long-term incentives are provided to executive officers through the Company's stock option program. 7 The Company's stock option program provides compensation that directly links the interests of management and shareholders and aids in retaining key executive officers. Executive officers are eligible for annual grants of stock options. The amount of stock options awarded to an executive officer are dependent on the following criteria: o the executive officer's past performance with the Company including sales directly attributable to operations managed by the executive officer; o the executive officer's ability to impact financial performance; and o the importance of the executive officer's responsibilities at the Company in light of the Company's future strategic plans. All individual stock option grants are reviewed and approved by the Committee. The exercise price of the stock options equals the fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date the options are granted. The options have a 5-year term and vest in three equal, annual increments beginning one year from the grant date. Executive officers receive gains from stock options only to the extent that the fair market value of the stock has increased since the date of option grant. During fiscal 2002, no new stock options were granted to executive officers. The Company repriced certain outstanding stock options. See "Report on Option Repricing" below. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION. The base salary for Mr. Young was $240,000 until January 21, 2002 when it was decreased by 10% to $216,000 as part of cost reduction measures. The base salary of the Chief Executive Officer is established by the Compensation Committee in generally the same way as the base salary is determined for other executive officers. A bonus payment under the annual incentive program described above was not made to Mr. Young during fiscal year 2002. In fiscal 2002, Mr. Young received no new stock option grants. The Company repriced all of Mr. Young's options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock, which were originally granted at various times during his employment. See "Report on Option Repricing" below. CONCLUSION. The executive officer compensation program administered by the Committee provides incentives to attain strong financial performance and aligns the interests of executive officers with shareholder interests. The Committee believes that the Company's compensation program focuses the efforts of the Company's executive officers on the achievement of growth, profitability and the enhancement of shareholder value for the benefit of all of the Company's shareholders. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Donald C. Wegmiller, Chairman Lee M. Berlin Alan C. Hymes, M.D. 8 SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION The following table shows the cash and non-cash compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, the calendar year ended December 31, 2001, and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, paid to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers of the Company. SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE