Leases

 

We adopted ASU No. 2016-02—Leases (Topic 842), as of January 1, 2019, (the “Application Date”) using the modified retrospective approach. We will continue to report financial information for fiscal years prior to 2019 under the previous lease accounting standards. The modified retrospective approach provides a method for recording on the balance sheet as of January 1, 2019, leases that have commenced on or before the Application Date.

 

We elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed us to not reassess whether any existing contracts contain a lease, to not reassess historical lease classification as operating or finance leases, and to not reassess initial direct costs. We also elected the practical expedient allowing us to not separate the lease and non-lease components for all classes of underlying assets, apart from equipment. We did not elect the practical expedient to use hindsight to determine the lease term for leases at January 1, 2019.

 

We made an accounting policy election to not recognize right-to-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from short term leases, which are defined as leases with a lease term of 12 months or less at the lease commencement date.

 

Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of right-to-use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $3,786 and $3,823, respectively, and the derecognition of capital lease assets, capital lease liabilities, and operating lease deferred rent of $96,  $63, and $70, respectively, as of January 1, 2019 with zero cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The new Leases standard did not materially impact our consolidated net earnings and had no impact on cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

 

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) No. 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, utilizing the modified retrospective method applied to contracts that were not completed. 

 

The Company enters into contracts to sell and distribute products and services to hospitals and surgical facilities for use in caring for patients with peripheral nerve damage or transection.  Revenue is recognized when the Company has met its performance obligations pursuant to its contracts with its customers in an amount that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for the transfer of control of the products and services to the Company’s customers.  In the case of products or services sold to a customer under a distribution or purchase agreement, the Company has no further performance obligations and revenue is recognized at the point control transfers which occurs either when:  i) the product is shipped via common carrier; or ii) the product is delivered to the customer or distributor, in accordance with the terms of the agreement. 

 

A portion of the Company's product revenue is generated from consigned inventory maintained at hospitals and independent sales agencies, and also from inventory physically held by field sales representatives. For these types of products sales, the Company retains control until the product has been used or implanted, at which time revenue is recognized.

 

The Company elected to account for shipping and handling activities as a fulfillment cost rather than a separate performance obligation. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling are included as part of the transaction price and recognized as revenue when control of the underlying products is transferred to the customer. The related shipping and freight charges incurred by the Company are included in the cost of sales.

 

The Company operates in a single reportable segment of peripheral nerve repair, offers similar products to its customers, and enters into consistently structured arrangements with similar types of customers. As such, the Company does not disaggregate revenue from contracts with customers as the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows does not materially differ within and among the contracts with customers.

 

The contract with the customer states the final terms of the sale, including the description, quantity, and price of each implant distributed. The payment terms and conditions in the Company’s contracts vary; however, as a common business practice, payment terms are typically due in full within 30 to 60 days of delivery. Since the customer agrees to a stated price in the contract that does not vary over the contract term, the contracts do not contain any material types of variable consideration, and contractual rights of return are not material.  The Company has several contracts with distributors in international markets which include consideration paid to the customer in exchange for distinct marketing and other services. The Company records such consideration paid to the customer as a reduction to revenue from the contracts with those distributor customers.

 

In connection with our AcroVal® Neurosensory and Motor Testing System, the Company sells extended warranty and service packages to some of its customers who purchase this evaluation and measurement tool, and the prepayment of these extended warranties represent contract liabilities until the performance obligations are satisfied ratably over the term of the contract. The sale of the aforementioned extended warranty represents the only performance obligation the Company satisfies over time and creates the contract liability disclosed below.  The opening and closing balances of the Company’s contract receivables and liabilities are as follows:

 

Recently Issued Standards to be Adopted

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 changes the fair value measurement disclosure requirements of ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement” by adding, eliminating, and modifying certain disclosure requirements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and requires application of the prospective method of transition. The Company is currently assessing the impact the guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Cloud Computing Arrangements

 

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Guidance on Cloud Computing Arrangements.  ASU 2018-15 provides guidance on implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement (“CCA”) that is a service contract and aligns the accounting for such costs with the guidance on capitalizing costs associated with developing or obtaining internal-use software.  Specifically, the ASU amends ASC 350 to include in its scope implementation costs of a CCA that is a service contract and clarifies that a customer should apply ASC 350-40 to determine which implementation costs should be capitalized.  This update is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.  We are currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

The Company’s management has reviewed and considered all other recent accounting pronouncements and believe there are none that could potentially have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or disclosures.